What are the central tenants of a good firearm? I think there are two *basic* tenants. 1) The rifle hits what it’s aimed at. 2) The rifle shoots when you tell it to. So basically it’s accurate and reliable. From this standpoint, a rifle accurate enough to hit your target and to do so reliably every time the trigger is pulled is all you really need. Then there are the details. The numerous details… The gravy. Gravy adds to the flavor. Turkey meat will keep you fed, but the dressing, the gravy, and the cranberries make you happy.
I recently acquired a 2020-2021 production 10/22… functionally it’s what a firearm should be, but is the turkey is missing the gravy?
Are *We* Making Chineseum?
The 10/22 is, was, and remains a “good” gun. When we look further past the central tenants of a good gun, things don’t seem as simple. The modern 10/22 has cost-cutting measures everywhere. I am a bit disappointed in the changes, as I have an authentic 1980s 10/22 to compare with. I also handled no less than 5 different current production models for comparison at the local shop and purchased one to keep for my disappointment.
The trigger guard and housing is plastic.
The finish is not anodized aluminum, but rather some type of paint or enamel.
The wood on standard models feels like balsa. The 1980’s era stock feels more substantial.
The barrel clamp ring is now plastic.
On my model: the synthetic stock appears horrendous and the printed camo pattern fades around areas of minute details such as near the diamond pattern of the grips. White can be seen. Raw nylon? Primer?
What Didn’t Change:
The barrel and sights appear to be exactly the same save for nitride instead of bluing?
The action feels as smooth as my 1980s example. This is nice as my old Ruger has miles and miles on it.
The trigger feels consistent with the 1980s Ruger. It feels different but not enough for me to lean one way or the other.
The mag release is a paddle instead of a button.
The barrel is threaded (on some models).
The bolt carrier has a laser engraved “Ruger” in case you forget which brand you are shooting during clearance drills.
Aftermarket magazines are available from Ruger. Now that Bill’s dead and the powers that be at Ruger put
pure profit the value of the Second Amendment on the pedestal they released nice factory 15 and 25 round magazines. Big improvement over the old Ram Lines.
Why Did You Do Dis:
Because if no one holds a manufacturer accountable then things will continue to cheapen and deteriorate. I grew up with the 10/22 in my hands. I know how it shoots. I know how it feels. The modern 10/22 is a downgrade is fit and finish across the board. I’m not a firearm connoisseur. I buy guns all the time knowing that I will fix issue X Y or Z. It simply hurts to see a degradation in fit and finish on such an iconic rifle.
I personally buy most of the kit you see on this blog, so I can share my opinions freely… The 10/22 is a reliable, albeit poorly finished .22 compared to it’s predecessors. Both the base model and polymer stocked models look as of the attention to detail was an afterthought.
Ruger should reduce the 10/22 lineup to a few base models and roll costs into revamping the quality of the furniture and components. I mean the Ruger ‘Murican flag Vote 2020 edition makes my loins tight and all, but it won’t have the same effect when the plastic has yellowed and the flag has worn off and the barrel band and trigger was eaten by a squirrel during the great boog of 2045.
Ruger set our 10/22 free. Clean the lineup. Keep a few. Restore the foundation.
Why did you buy this den?
Thanks for asking RockDog. I’ll tell you why. The 10/22 is still a trouble-free rimfire that shoots when you tell it to and hits where it’s aimed. So long as that remains unchanged in that regard, the 10/22 may continue coasting on its timeless, reliable design. Also, it’s $250 ish. So there’s dat.
Is That All?
Not quite. No not quite. I feel for Gen Z as their 10/22 is inferior to the Ruger of yesteryear… But being too late to the game doesn’t mean you can’t roll your own. We’re going to fix it. We’re going to make it better. Next up, Accuracy evaluation, and a few upgrades to give you a rimfire you will be proud to pass down.
Series, enter stage right:
The Rimfire Rifleman
I know exactly how feel about the 10/22. I have a Sporter model purchased in 1976. It has a walnut stock with checkering. It’s 100% reliable, even with subsonic ammo and will put five shots on your thumbnail at 50 yards. They really don’t build them the way they used to.
Shame. Looking forward to the next episode.
I hate to but agree now that some Global Corporatist owns Ruger, they are not in the business of making guns. They are in the business of making money and maximizing profit! They may decide to strip out all the equity and sell of the label and scraps next week to a pallet manufacturer next week who wants access to their wood supplier or some European Conglomerate who wants to buy out the competition or some such. CZ bought Colt for their military and police business, will they cheapen the other Colts to zinc castings, quit making them all together, to make CZ the only choice. Bill Ruger cheapened his gun designs as much has practical with the then current tech but still wanted a gun not what we see today. I’m positive he would not go along with it. It will cost the Ruger brand in the market place, in the long run but the “Investors” will have made their percentage, their profits and sell Ruger and invest in Chinese tooth picks. They have no commitment to product, reputation and long term survivability of Ruger firearms. They are living off their former glory/reputation and it won’t last. I’m not going to buy a Tiffany that is now made of plastic and a birch 2×4!.
Thompson center makes a better 10/22 version that ruger does now. Admittedly, the rear sight fell off of mine, but SW mailed me a new one, NQA, not even a serial number, and since then, all has been great.
Many 10/22s don’t even have barrel bands anymore.
Most recent I bought was circa ~2015 and barrels are black oxide or similar. Rusts too easily for nitride.
Their camo stuff is all hydrodipped best as I can tell.
Has Ruger cheapened the 10/22 Sporter with plastic parts etc. or just the carbine versions?